The movie has redefined the darkest corners of the Internet with obscure and amatuer satirical sites spinning this movies marketing campaign brilliance. Just do a google image search on "snakes on a plane" and see what you get back.Overall, the movie wouldn't have even made it straight-to-video if it didn't have the star power of Jackson behind it. Jackson saves this film from darkest bowels of Walmart bargin bin. Other than Jackson and an hour-and-a-half of senseless snake violence, this movie had very little going for it.
I never knew a writer could be so creative with snake attacks but I was proven wrong with this movie. Every sacred body part known to man was viciously attacked in this film. Shock value was the only vechicle driving this movie forward. But I most say, the creativity kept the horror movie and the audience screaming for more.
Rating: 4.5 out of 10
Exactly what you expect, Will Farrel in exactly the same movie he's done over and over again just with a differnent background. Its like Anchor Man with cars. So if you love Will Farrel and you love all of his movies, then this movie was made especially for you.
I wasn't sure what to think going into this movie. Was it going to be a poorly done, mediocre, or spectacular as an independent film? Good news, it's somewhere between mediocre and spectacular. Maybe the word is mediocular or spectaculicre. How about the word great and entertaining.
This is a heavy hitting horror film that successfully does what The Cave tried so desperately to accomplish and failed. The Descent does an excellent job of closing us in and giving the audience a keen awareness of the claustrophobic space these spelunkers are trapped in. The director also did a good job on the cave dwellers. Instead of going the straight-to-video route with cheap CGI computer creatures, he decided to go with poorly lit live-action monstrosities in costume.
I've been shocked at how well this movie has made it through the critics. Based on their comments, you'd think we've got another Toy Story or Finding Nemo. But the reality is, it's far from it. Have we gotten to a point where the eye candy of the computer animation outweighs the story, characters, and dialogue? If so, it's a sad day.
Hands down the greatest movie of the summer. It filled in the empty hole in my soul that Superman had left. Exciting and fun, great story with great characters, a well written script, and polished off with extraodinary stunts and special effects. I'm a huge fan of the franchise now.
I went into this film with pretty low expectations, so when the film turned out to be very entertaining, I came out of the theater a happy person. Great story with an interesting mix of characters kept the movie going a good pace.
M. Night has created what I feel is an excellent story that is well told in a cinematic format. Many critics have slammed this movie like a wrestling move focusing solely on M. Night's arrogance to cast himself in the movie as the writer who will save the world. Yeah, that's pretty snotty of him, but hey, it's still a great story.
I loved the movie but I'm a little ashamed that I did. The movie definitely is over-the-top with shock humor, but I think the tid-bits of social satire made it stomachable. I'm a huge fan of the original because of the long dialogues that revolve around pointless conversations. And Clerks II delivered a taste of these same themes.
I went to see this movie knowing deep down in the darkest recess of my heart that I was going to hate it. But in the spirit of trying to get in as many top ten movies as I can, I went to see it anyway, against my own will. Let's recap: this movie hovered in the number two spot and to date has grossed more than 50 million dollars. The only insight I gained from watching it is now I know that there are at least 7 million people willing to spend $7.00 on average to see flicks that they know are going to suck.