Monday, January 26, 2009

Underworld: Rise of the Lycans

I had serious doubts about this movie. I thought for sure that the movie was going to be horribly bad because it didn’t have Kate Beckinsale and it was being directed by a first-time director. But I was wrong, the movie is actually pretty good and for the most part holds its own when compared to the other two Underworld movies.

Rhona Mitra does a great job with the lead role. She has proven herself to be a great actress even though in the past she has chosen to star in some pretty bad movies (Doomsday, Beowulf, Skinwalkers). Michael Sheen also did a great job playing Lucian, though I was not a fan of his outfits in the movie.

First time director Patrick Tatopoulos did a much better job than I expected. His background is in special effects and art direction. Usually when an art director steps behind the camera to direct, it all goes horribly wrong (like Janusz Kaminski doing Lost Souls or David Goyer doing The Unborn).

If you like Underworld, then you naturally have to see this prequel.

Rating: 8 out of 10

Inkheart

Brendan Frasier has solidified himself in my mind as one of the worst actors of our generation. He knows he is such a bad actor that he has now resorted to only acting in family-friendly films. He seemed like a hard-working actor in his early years but lately he just seems like he’s given up. In my opinion, he’s more about getting a quick paycheck then by mastering his craft and becoming a great actor.

The movie itself isn’t too bad. The concept is absolutely brilliant. Brendan Frasier has the ability to bring books to life by reading them out loud. I believe that they could have done a lot more with the idea but they did enough to keep the movie entertaining. I believe the book the movie was based on probably did a better job at this. For some reason the movie tried to focus more than it needed to on character development then on milking the story for everything its worth. I would have also focused a lot more on the special effects.

Overall, the movie is great for kids 6-12. For better movies with similar storylines see “Bridge to bridge to Terabithia”, “The Spiderwick Chronicles” or “Narnia”.

Rating: 3.5 out of 10

My Bloody Valentine 3-D

If this movie hadn’t been created in 3-D then it would have gone straight to DVD and to the bargain bin faster than a sequel to Ben Affleck’s Gigli. The movie is everything you would expect: poorly written, poorly acted, ridiculous storyline and incompetent directing. But it’s still a fun romp of a horror movie. And the director definitely squeezed out every type of death that could lend itself to three dimensions. Pickaxe murders, squirting blood, eye popping out, decapitated heads sliding down a shovel towards the audience. This movie also contains the longest full-frontal nude scene that I think I’ve ever seen in a “R” rated film. I’m really not sure how they avoided the NC-17 rating.

With all of that said, this film is worth watching in 3-D. Skip the 2-D version altogether.

Rating: 4 out of 10.

Gran Torino

This is Clint at his best. They really should have named the film “Dirty Harry: The Retirement Years”. The movie is brilliantly written and plays out like a mix of the movies “Colors” and “As Good as it Gets” (what an unlikely combo).

Along with the great screenplay comes great acting. The only ding I would give the film is Clint’s directing. Although strong, had another director got a hold of it I think it could have been flawless. You can tell that Clint has some weaknesses with regards to cinematography and editing.

I would recommend this movie for just about anyone. It has a perfect blend of good storytelling, shock value and a hint of bitter sweetness.

Rating: 8.5 out of 10

The Unborn

This movie would have been better off had it not been born. David Goyer, the director of this film, is a brilliant writer. That where it stops though, because his directing skills are worse than an infant with a home video camera. Don't get me wrong. The cinetography was good, the actors did fine, it's just that Mr. Goyer doesn't have the knack to put all of the different elements together to make a great, engaging movie.

Most of the haunting elements of the movie are stolen right out of "The Grudge". Creepy kid popping up in dreams and reality making menacing faces. If I wanted to see another poorly done Grude movie, than I would have rented 'The Grudge II".

I have to give it to the actors though. Gary Oldman did a great job even though he didn't really have to much except read aloud in Hebrew and blow an animal horn. But the real star is Odette Yustman. She has come a long way since Kindergarten Cop. Keep an eye out for this actress because I'm sure she is going to be a star in twenty-something teen horror flicks and romantic comedies.

Rating: 3 out of 10

Monday, January 12, 2009

The Curious Case of Benjamin Button

This is a beautiful movie that makes you think about life and death by telling the story of a man who lives life backwards. Though the plot is just a nifty trick to make a insightful movie more intriguing, it also allows the director David Fincher to display some cutting edge technology capabilities by superimposing Brad Pitt's face onto a little person.

And even though the movie is beautiful and insightful, it is also long, slow and a bit on the boring side. It's a good idea to see a brainless actino flick after watching this film to help balance your mind, heart and soul out.

Wonderful acting, great story, well written and well directed. This is a solid movie all the way through.

Rating: 8.5 out of 10

The Spirit

This movie had a lot of potential. The comic artist, writer and inspiration behind "300" and "Sin City". You'd think it would at least be as good as those films. But you would be seriously wrong. The first time director Frank Miller completely misses the mark with this movie that just goes to show that some people should just stick with what they're good at.

The acting is the worst part of the movie. The acting in this movie makes Jim Carrey look subtle. It's more over-the-top than Sylvester Stallone in the movie "Over the Top" (truck driver arm wrestling movie...don't ask). Along with the bad acting is the horrible, horrible dialogue and the terrible story.

Probably the only redeming quality about the film is the special effects and the art direction. Other than that, skip this flick.

Rating: 2 out of 10

Yes Man

Don't listen to the title. If someone asks you if you want to see this movie, don't be a yes man, just say NO! I fondly refer to this movie as Liar Liar 2. It's the same story, except that instead of telling the truth, Jim Carrey has to say yes to everything. Problem is that the jokes are same in Yes Man as they are in Liar Liar, except the second time around it's not as entertaining.

The heart of the movie revolves around Jim Carrey having a midlife crisis. During this time he goes from being a non-social recluse into a hyperactive life liver. The creepiest part is that he falls in love with a girl that is at least half his age. Seeing a middle-aged man and a young woman try to have a conversation is more uncomfortable than Bret Michaels try to have serious relationships with ex-strippers.

If you've seen any of Jim Carrey's movies than you've seen this movie already. It's the same rehashed jokes that got Jim Carrey popular in the first place.

Rating: 3 out of 10

Bedtime Stories

Bedtime Stories is a great movie for 10-year-old boys. If you're not 10 and your not a boy, sorry, this film is ridiculously stupid. Adam Sandler plays the same character he always plays, a dim-witted loser whose jokes are only laughed at by school-age children. It's same character we saw in Billy Madison, Happy Gilmore, The Waterboy, 50 First Dates, Mr. Deeds, Little Nicky, Big Daddy, The Wedding Singer and Airheads. Do you see the trend yet?

The movie has a great premise, Adam Sandler tells two kids that he is babysitting some bedtime stories and the stories come to life the next day. It's just too bad the fun and promising premise is wasted on poor writing, bad acting and mundane dialogue. The directing is average and some of the special effects are well done.

One word best summarizes this movie: infantile.

Rating: 3 out of 10